Why I Was Unmoved by the Sikh Prayer at the RNC

Amidst all of the other things going on at the RNC this past week, night two started with something very unusual -- a California lawyer named Harmeet Dhillon recited a part of the Sikh Ardaas prayer that is one of the central prayers in the Sikh daily practice. A room full of Trump and Cruz supporters bowed their heads and followed along in silence.  This is probably the highest profile "Sikh sighting" we have had in this country since the tragedy of the Oak Creek Gurdwara mass shooting three years ago. It ought to be an occasion to celebrate.

I wanted to be proud of Harmeet Dhillon for being brave enough to do this, considering that, in the past, large Republican gatherings have not always respected Sikhs or Sikh prayers. If this were any other cycle for the Republican party -- if this had happened at Romney's convention in 2012, for instance -- I would be only too happy to celebrate this.

But here's the thing...

The Republican candidate for President this year, Donald Trump, has consistently and repeatedly advocated banning another religious minority community from entering the country. The Republican party as a whole has become a hotbed of viciously anti-Islamic thinking. Among the leadership there are few voices who have the basic decency to follow the example of former Republican President George W. Bush -- who in his public statements carefully differentiated between the vast majority of Muslims around the world who want nothing more than the opportunity to live their lives and freely practice their faith in peace, and the small minority who support Jihadism.

Sikhs are not Muslims. But as members of an immigrant community, and as members of a small, but highly visible religious minority in American society, we are not so different from our Muslim American brothers and sisters. I cannot understand how we could look at what's happening in the Republican party with regards to the demonization of Muslims and not see our fate as a community as connected to theirs.

For these reasons, I cannot be moved by the recitation of the Ardaas at the RNC. My understanding of Sikhism is that it has, as a core principle, a rejection of discriminatory thinking. The tradition started by Guru Nanak more than 500 years ago was born out of a sense of the deep injustice of the Indian caste system. The poet Kabir once said: "There is no Hindu, there is no Mussalman [Muslim]"; those lines are also in the Guru Granth Sahib, considered the sacred and authoritative scripture for Sikhs. Those words represent a fundamental rejection of discrimination based on religious identity. 

The philosophy and the ethics engendered by the Bhakti movement and by this strain of thinking within Sikhism might well have something to say to the Republican party of today. Perhaps we could go a step further and say that it is actually something today's Republican party desperately needs to hear. But that is not the message that was sent to the Republican National Convention Tuesday night. And I don't see much here to celebrate.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Trump's stance on Muslim immigration is only 1 policy out of dozens that he has made public. If complete alignment on a political party's platform is a prerequisite to Sikh participation in their convention, we will never witness a Sikh standing at the podium. Not to mention, the position of Sikhs on any particular policy is varied and diverse. Strange as it may sound to most of us, there's undoubtedly misguided Sikhs who support a temporary halt on Muslim immigration. Right or wrong, they deserve to see their religion represented at their candidate's official nominating convention.

The RNC gave an opportunity to bring awareness to the 60% of Americans who know absolutely nothing about the Sikh religion, many of whom are likely Republicans, and Ms Dhillon rose to the occasion on behalf of the Panth. Although I'm not a Republican, I was delighted to see it happen as were many others. Your blog post smacks of the attention seeking teenager who shrugs and feigns disinterest merely to have his voice heard.